3 ms·
The memo didn't cause self doubt, the memo was intended to inspire others to look for doubt (hence the "lowering the bar"). The memo specifically targeted dive
by notreallythough 9y ago
The memo didn't cause self doubt, the memo was intended to inspire others to look for doubt (hence the "lowering the bar").
The memo specifically targeted diversity hires as a lower bar. Imagine if a memo started circulating that asked everyone to question whether or not you were hired for your skill. That's a terrible environment to create.
- jjn2009 9y agoLowering the bar for a cohort is going to create different distributions of skill in that cohort, this person wasn't the first and won't be the last to come to this conclusion. I think damaging organizational cohesion is never the right choice but both sides of this argument contribute to that damage.
- irpapakons 9y agoThere is no evidence of lowering the bar. Companies like Google aim to cast a wider net at candidates, the bar stays the same. On the contrary, there is evidence of bias against women, which logically means that the bar is lower for men by default.
- jjn2009 9y agoI'm telling you in plain mathematical terms that the way you go about hiring effects the distribution of candidates skill if you introduce any bias into the system regardless of whether or not its a literal or figurative bar or a bias on any parameter. I don't think anyone is going to disagree that biases exist on both sides of the aisle. Arguing about what google does or does not do is futile exercise I made zero claim about google and only believe they have introduced some biases in their hiring in some form.
- notreallythough 9y agoThere's no evidence they lowered the bar on skill level. This entire thread is a demonstration of "it's much easier to fool someone than to convince someone they've been fooled"