4 ms·
So, if bring your car back, sixty days after taking it, it wasn't taken away? They took their property. They are deprived of its use. It really can't be more c
by KGIII 9y ago
So, if bring your car back, sixty days after taking it, it wasn't taken away?
They took their property. They are deprived of its use. It really can't be more clear. That they may get it back later doesn't mean it wasn't taken.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> So, if bring your car back, sixty days after taking it, it wasn't taken away? If you give me your car as part of a contracted arrangement where, in certain circumstances, you will temporarily lose your access to it, then I haven't taken it from you, even if those circumstances materialize (as a result of your action or otherwise.) I may have denied you access to it, but that happens all the time, with all kinds of property, in contracted relationships, without prior involvement of an outside arbiter.
- KGIII 9y agoAnd there are many times when this can not happen. Example? Eviction. That requires a process, complete with appeals. Good. Do that. This is not okay, even if Nazis suck.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> And there are many times when this can not happen. Example? Eviction. That requires a process, complete with appeals. Good. Sure. Now where is the argument that the special protection granted to real property tenants but not applied to most other contractual property arrangements should be paralleled for domain name registration? > This is not okay, even if Nazis suck. Repetition of a conclusion is not an argument for it.