3 ms·
Are you referring to the absence of a byline? That's because The Economist generally does not attribute editorials to authors. This one is not special. https:/
by tantalor 9y ago
Are you referring to the absence of a byline? That's because The Economist generally does not attribute editorials to authors. This one is not special.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist#Editorial_anonymity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist#Editorial_anonym...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- trothamel 9y agoIt's the mix of the lack of a byline, and the basic premise of putting words in someone else's mouth that kind of rubs me the wrong way. "It is my position that it is only honorable that people should talk about James Damore under their own names." - Abraham Lincoln