> I refuse to be squelched because some > Neo Nazi could use my words against me. You misunderstand again. I said that violent or smearing actions done for s

> I refuse to be squelched because some > Neo Nazi could use my words against me. You misunderstand again. I said that violent or smearing actions done for sound moral reasons can and are used to publicise and win support for the alt-right cause. While you might not care about your own personal risk, as a citizen of the world you should care about having your actions used to create political material that radicalises people towards the alt-right cause as this threatens people other than you. It doesn't matter whether they are idiots or not, it matters whether bad players have an easy or hard time making their case and recruiting supporters. Make it difficult, not easy! > The instances you quote have nothing > whatsoever to do with debating this > in a facts and reason based way on an internet forum. I fundamentally disagree. They demonstrate the mechanism by which the alt-right grew their support so quickly. This is important to the argument at hand and since you can't seem to see this and I don't have any more source material to counter your very strong opinions with, I don't think there's any point in arguing around it any further.