> ...you ostensibly are committed to keeping manufacturing jobs in the US > ...these companies aren't going to stay in the US A problem with these is the presu

> ...you ostensibly are committed to keeping manufacturing jobs in the US > ...these companies aren't going to stay in the US A problem with these is the presumption that it is a timelessly, inherently, and unquestionably good objective. Just like the pursuit of (re)creating coal jobs, as if that's prudent and admirable, no matter what. > ...could be seen as complicit of Trump. "Could"? I don't think anyone who's being intellectually honest would be able to claim otherwise. If you serve a leader in an advisory role, you are actively in support of their policies and actions. Even if you disagree and the leader chooses otherwise or acts contrary to your advice, your role by its nature demonstrates that you are deferring to their leadership, thus you support it. (I acknowledge that you are explaining views that are not necessarily your own.)