4 ms·

I don't understand why everyone wouldn't subtitle their content. I used rev.com and it costs $1 per minute and the results are great. So to subtitle three hou

I don't understand why everyone wouldn't subtitle their content. I used rev.com and it costs $1 per minute and the results are great. So to subtitle three hours cost $240. With many non-native English speakers as customers it is a no-brainer. It's good to hear this too, because the text in that box originally said 'Filmed in 4K' and I only changed it to 'Fully subtitled' at the last moment.

bitJericho 9y ago
They probably should. It seems to be required by law (in the US) in a lot of situations.
cpr 9y ago
Great to know about them. But their web site says $7.50/minute for subtitling, $1 for transcriptions. Still may be quite reasonable to extend video reach that much.
sametmax 9y ago
Because it's lot of work. Like everything, it depends of the investment vs reward, unless you are driven by virtue.
- nxc18 9y ago
  I came from a school with a large Hard of Hearing population... I've really come to appreciate captioning on all videos. Mainly I just don't like listening to people say things very much, most videos have super annoying soundtracks and effects or other distortion, and really reading is just as effective. Have captions on your video for everyone, not just the deaf people in your audience (unless you just really love the sound of your own voice so much that you want to force other people to suffer through it).
  - sametmax 9y ago
    I don't say it's not a good thing to have them. But it's not free. Either it's worth it or you are a good doer.
cookiecaper 9y ago
I used rev for transcriptions once and I had to have the file redone twice because the first two transcriptions were useless. Haven't bothered with it since. This was years ago so maybe they've improved.
Bilters 9y ago
Thanks for sharing what you've used to transcribe / subtitle your video's with. I've been looking for a source like this, and sounds like you're happy with their service. I'll give it a go on my next video project.

bitJericho 9y ago

They probably should. It seems to be required by law (in the US) in a lot of situations.

cpr 9y ago

Great to know about them. But their web site says $7.50/minute for subtitling, $1 for transcriptions. Still may be quite reasonable to extend video reach that much.

sametmax 9y ago

Because it's lot of work. Like everything, it depends of the investment vs reward, unless you are driven by virtue.

nxc18 9y ago
I came from a school with a large Hard of Hearing population... I've really come to appreciate captioning on all videos. Mainly I just don't like listening to people say things very much, most videos have super annoying soundtracks and effects or other distortion, and really reading is just as effective. Have captions on your video for everyone, not just the deaf people in your audience (unless you just really love the sound of your own voice so much that you want to force other people to suffer through it).
- sametmax 9y ago
  I don't say it's not a good thing to have them. But it's not free. Either it's worth it or you are a good doer.

cookiecaper 9y ago

I used rev for transcriptions once and I had to have the file redone twice because the first two transcriptions were useless. Haven't bothered with it since. This was years ago so maybe they've improved.

Bilters 9y ago

Thanks for sharing what you've used to transcribe / subtitle your video's with. I've been looking for a source like this, and sounds like you're happy with their service. I'll give it a go on my next video project.