4 ms·
> Because your initial comment pans gitlab quite extensively I said they have 2 issues arise a year (which, by the way, was already counter argued before you j
by laumars 9y ago
> Because your initial comment pans gitlab quite extensively
I said they have 2 issues arise a year (which, by the way, was already counter argued before you joined the thread). I did also compliment 2 other aspects of their business. So to say my "initial comment pans gitlab quite extensively" and "your scorn" is needlessly sensationalising things.
We are all professionals so can we please have a grounded discussion?
- jacquesm 9y ago> which, by the way, was already counter argued before you joined the thread I tend to open a bunch of tabs and go through them one-by-one so apologies for the duplicates. > I did also compliment 2 other aspects of their business. The proper description of that is 'damning with faint praise', of which your comment is an excellent example. > So to say my "initial comment pans gitlab quite extensively" and "your scorn" is needlessly sensationalising things. No, I think it is a quite accurate description of your comment. Whether you agree with that or not is up to you, but just take the fact that I read it as such as a datapoint. > We are all professionals so can we please have a grounded discussion? That's an assumption that I won't comment on.