3 ms·
Not sure how this view should be interpreted: - Websites should not have ToS - Websites may have ToS, users should be able to violate it without consequenc
by avip 9y ago
Not sure how this view should be interpreted:
- Websites should not have ToS
- Websites may have ToS, users should be able to violate it without consequences if they don't like it ( = roughly current state of affairs)
- Websites may only have ToS derived from some criminal act
- something else?
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoHow about "Website ToS should only be legally enforceable if users have actively indicated acceptance of them, not simply by saying that you agree to the ToS if you read the website".
- ikeboy 9y agoThe current injunction says LinkidIn can't even refuse to serve pages if they detect a ToS violation.