3 ms·
> Imagining your philosophical "opponents" as some sort of one dimensional monsters isn't doing yourself or your movement any favors. That would have been a va
by dguaraglia 9y ago
> Imagining your philosophical "opponents" as some sort of one dimensional monsters isn't doing yourself or your movement any favors.
That would have been a valid claim until the unfortunate incidents in Charlottesville (and Bloomington before that, and Seattle before that...) People threatening to expose liberal Googlers to the same kind of ecochamber that celebrates someone driving a car into a crowd is beyond the pale. Anyone who takes so lightly potentially having blood in their hands is a monster.
This is my last comment regarding this topic.
- mistermann 9y ago> Anyone who takes so lightly potentially having blood in their hands is a monster. That person being me presumably. Guilty until proven innocent, a recurring theme lately. > This is my last comment regarding this topic. What a loss. EDIT: Seems I'm not being allowed to reply anymore (gee, where do conspiracy theories about censorship of conservative speech come from eh?), so I guess I'll have to reply here... > No, I was talking about the Googlers who were threatening to leak names to alt-right websites. You wanted the people that are threatening to leak names to be outraged at themselves? I think I'm losing track of all the parties involved in this vast criminal conspiracy. Anyways, besides this entire topic being utterly pointless, if the right to speak freely is granted to only one side, I guess I should take the hint and adapt to our new world by keeping my mouth shut.
- dguaraglia 9y ago> That person being me presumably No, I was talking about the Googlers who were threatening to leak names to alt-right websites.