That is not my point. I do not see a problem with Google refusing service to the Daily Stormer. However, the story started with GoDaddy kicking them out then G

That is not my point. I do not see a problem with Google refusing service to the Daily Stormer. However, the story started with GoDaddy kicking them out then Google refusing their services. Two occurrences are too few to infer a trend, but enough for me to start wondering: DNS providers are all private companies. So what would happen if provider after provider the site goes after denies them their services? Does the union of the these refusals amount to censorship? In principle, it's only the union of individual private refusal. But in effect the Daily Stormer is barred from DNS service access. Also, I did not think that I would need to clarify, but this is a legitimate, non-partisan question. The arguments are still valid regardless of the object of the topic.