4 ms·
Well you pretty much just concisely spelled out your political leanings. >no one can make a unanimous conclusion for what hate speech is Would it be a "unanim
by Eleopteryx 9y ago
Well you pretty much just concisely spelled out your political leanings.
>no one can make a unanimous conclusion for what hate speech is
Would it be a "unanimous" conclusion if it were a conclusion drawn by a singular person or entity?
>It now means using gender pronouns to refer to people
Do you have an example of this being identified as hate speech?
- desbest 9y ago> Would it be a "unanimous" conclusion if it were a conclusion drawn by a singular person or entity? Which singular person or entity should be responsible for determining what "hate speech" is? According to SJWiki I am a neurosexist for believing that men and women have different brains and that gender is not a social construct. Should SJWiki be trusted? According to the ADL, Gavin McInnes and Mike Cernovich are hate preachers. Should the ADL be trusted? > Do you have an example of this being identified as hate speech? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMl4kIxw-jo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMl4kIxw-jo Also it's a slippery slope because once the "hate speech" clampdown happens, we'll then be punished for microaggressions, so even if you're not a racist, you'll be seen as racist for asking what race or ethnicity someone is?