3 ms·
I took it to mean that it is feasible. Instead of saying "well we used the wrong language, I guess we're screwed," you rewrite one component at a time, piece by
by funkymike 9y ago
I took it to mean that it is feasible. Instead of saying "well we used the wrong language, I guess we're screwed," you rewrite one component at a time, piece by piece, until the whole has been replaced.
This is the approach I try to use myself. It's nearly impossible to replace an entire system all at once. But replacing one part at a time is doable and you can see the improvements much sooner.
- weberc2 9y agoBy "it is infeasible", I meant, "removing the GIL is infeasible"; not "rewriting is infeasible".