4 ms·

Sounds like you're saying this is infeasible; care to explain why?

• funkymike 9y ago
  I took it to mean that it is feasible. Instead of saying "well we used the wrong language, I guess we're screwed," you rewrite one component at a time, piece by piece, until the whole has been replaced. This is the approach I try to use myself. It's nearly impossible to replace an entire system all at once. But replacing one part at a time is doable and you can see the improvements much sooner.
  • weberc2 9y ago
    By "it is infeasible", I meant, "removing the GIL is infeasible"; not "rewriting is infeasible".