I think it's more like a different type english. You express the same types of concepts, but you break them down into very small parts and than build up the ar

I think it's more like a different type english. You express the same types of concepts, but you break them down into very small parts and than build up the argument comprised of small parts. Like instead of saying "the bike went forwards" which is very conceptual and requires a lot of background understanding of bikes and physics, you describe a bike consisting of wheels, a frame, a steering wheel etc. than describe the action of moving in a direction. finally you apply to action to the bike.