3 ms·
>So youtube should allow porn, gore, etc? It had, for ages. >Youtube also has freedom of speech. They have the freedom to filter and compile videos that they
by AmIFirstToThink 9y ago
>So youtube should allow porn, gore, etc?
It had, for ages.
>Youtube also has freedom of speech. They have the freedom to filter and compile videos that they like and only show those.
Sure they do. I wish they were honest about their political ideology before they touted the platform for all to come and participate.
>It's my website after all, I am allowed to control what is on it.
Sure you are. I just wish you had advertised as such before content creators invested time and money into the platform, creating user base for you. That's a bait and switch, no different than Apache to AGPL license change on 27.8.3 version of your successful GitHub project.
A private entity and a public corporation and government are three different levels of individual discriminatory behavior. A private person or business can employ any discriminatory practice they see fit, as you yourself say. A government is held at highest standard of equality for all. A publicly traded corporation is somewhere in between the government and a private citizen.
- Buge 9y agoYoutube allowed porn for ages? Here's an article from 2006 saying youtube at that time banned porn, and made no reference to it being allowed in the past.[1] Youtube doesn't hide the fact that it bans certain content.[2] And this page isn't new, in fact it looks nearly identical to how it did in 2013.[3] [1] https://techcrunch.com/2006/07/25/youtube-has-porn-clone/ https://techcrunch.com/2006/07/25/youtube-has-porn-clone/ [2] https://www.youtube.com/yt/policyandsafety/policy.html https://www.youtube.com/yt/policyandsafety/policy.html [3] https://web.archive.org/web/20130416013037/https://www.youtube.com/yt/policyandsafety/policy.html https://web.archive.org/web/20130416013037/https://www.youtu...