3 ms·
I get impression that people who bash this new .Net stuff and naming are really theoretical in their approach. If you are actually doing anything with .Net the
by ozim 9y ago
I get impression that people who bash this new .Net stuff and naming are really theoretical in their approach.
If you are actually doing anything with .Net there is no way you can confuse .Net 2.0 with .Net Core 2.0.
- nolok 9y agoAgreed 100%, and I would add that the threshold for "doing anything with .Net" to reach that proficiency is spending just a few minutes on it.
- addicted 9y agoWhat is .Net 2.0? Or do you mean .Net Framework 2.0?
- systems 9y agothe stable release of the .Net Framework is not 4.7 the .Net Framework 2.0 release date was 2005-11-07 i guess he was being sarcastic ... maybe
- throwawayacc321 9y agoheh. good on Satya Nadella. stopped using ms stuff more than a decade ago when we went linux for all production machines. from mouth to desktop he has started making microsoft and the good work they do relevent again. - hadnt realised they'd actually released so much linux compatible stuff.
- nolok 9y agoThrow Visual Studio Code in and you can both develop and deploy/run your entire web app on linux using Microsoft tools now, tools that are actually good and pleasant to use. Predict that fifteen years ago on slashdot and you would probably be "-42 ridiculous" back then.
- tonyedgecombe 9y agoI get the impression that some people have no empathy for new users.