2 ms·
1) Because "local news" by its very nature doesn't mean anything (or anywhere). Since it is a ubiquitous term, anything can be local news. 2) Since local news
by croon 9y ago
1) Because "local news" by its very nature doesn't mean anything (or anywhere). Since it is a ubiquitous term, anything can be local news.
2) Since local news doesn't have a defined head, it's hard to scrutinize, whereas national/global news is at least exposed for what it is (regardless of whether people recognize that or not).
3) What I mainly wanted make a point about was the future of local news in regards to Sinclair buying up Tribune Media stations [1]. That would make it "local news" with quite a blatant, pointed agenda.
[1] http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/06/trump-fcc-sinclair-broadcast-expansion-241337 http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/06/trump-fcc-sinclair-...
- lin_lin 9y agoI think most people know what's meant by "local news". Fair enough about State side events, I'm in the UK. My local news papers are far and away the most trusted source of news I have in the traditional form. The BBC, Sky, the national papers can take a running jump.