3 ms·

Hmm, perhaps I have a false confidence in it because I was unable to detect the factual errors. The number one use I had for it was news on business and it seem

by arjie 9y ago

Hmm, perhaps I have a false confidence in it because I was unable to detect the factual errors. The number one use I had for it was news on business and it seemed helpful there. Would you mind sharing some examples? I haven't subscribed in quite a while (I live in the UK now).

Retric 9y ago
It's been a few years (edit: over a decade), but the usual factual errors like names where not bad though I noticed a few. But, technical details around Java seemed to be a game of telephone where what they said was at best vaguely true if you ignored what was said and tried to decode what someone else said. Which seems to be the basic problem with using reporters who don't understand the subject matter. Now, they have a good reputation. But, I don't know where it comes from exactly as I have heard similar issues with their coverage of DNA editing etc.