5 ms·

> t really was dumb luck that prevented the Khans from driving all the way to the Western shores of Spain. You can say the same with Japan. Mongols never inva

> t really was dumb luck that prevented the Khans from driving all the way to the Western shores of Spain. You can say the same with Japan. Mongols never invaded it cause of bad weather. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Japan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Japan

bhnmmhmd 9y ago
Given their vicious inhumane barbarity and brutality, I'm sure if his tomb was found, millions of people would want to destroy it and exhume his body and smash it into smithereens. What they did to Iran (formerly Persia) and the middle east can not be forgotten. Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. I don't know how Mongols today live with that.
- selectodude 9y ago
  I think they're a bit too worried about living on $1.25/day to have strong opinions on Ghengis Khan.
- pavel_lishin 9y ago
  > I don't know how Mongols today live with that. Don't look too closely into your own ancestry; the only thing saving you from existential despair might be that some ancestor's violence and cruelty was only offset by their utter forgettability in the flow of history.
  - bhnmmhmd 9y ago
    > the only thing saving you from existential despair might be that some ancestor's violence and cruelty was only offset by their utter forgettability in the flow of history. I think you're forgetting about the fact that in all human history, Genghis stands out as one of the cruelest and most violent rulers. As far as I know, Iranians (Persians) never did the same thing to other nations, not even for revenge. I guess that's the main reason saving Iranians from "existential despair".
    - pavel_lishin 9y ago
      I guess Genghis has a heck of a mote in his eye, eh?
    - Lokran 9y ago
      How do you feel about this ancient Persian torture method? "The intended victim was stripped naked and then firmly fastened within the interior space of two narrow rowing boats (or hollowed-out tree trunks) joined together one on top of the other with the head, hands and feet protruding. The condemned was forced to ingest milk and honey, and more honey would be poured on the victim to attract insects, with special attention devoted to the eyes, ears, mouth, face, genitals, and anus. In some cases, the executioner would mix milk and honey and pour that mixture all over the victim. The victim would then be left to float on a stagnant pond or be exposed to the sun. The defenseless individual's feces accumulated within the container, attracting more insects which would eat and breed within the victim's exposed flesh, which—pursuant to interruption of the blood supply by burrowing insects—became increasingly gangrenous. The individual would lie naked, covered from head to toe in milk, honey, and his own feces. The feeding would be repeated each day in some cases to prolong the torture, so that fatal dehydration or starvation did not occur. Death, when it eventually occurred, was probably due to a combination of dehydration, starvation, and septic shock. Delirium would typically set in after a few days.[1]." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism
    - Lokran 9y ago
      Equally, how do you feel about killing a servants son and having him eat him because he had refused to kill a child? "Herodotus accounts for the turn of Harpagus' support to a version of the cannibal feast of Thyestes.[1] He reports that Astyages, after having a dream that his daughter, Mandane, would give birth to a king who would overthrow him, ordered Harpagus to expose the child at birth. Harpagus, reluctant to spill his own royal blood, gave the child (Cyrus) to a shepherd named Mitradates,[2] who raised him as his own son. Ten years later, when Cyrus was discovered alive, Astyages cruelly punished Harpagus by killing Harpagus' only son and feeding him to the courtier during a banquet. It is said that Harpagus did not react during the banquet, other than to gather the pieces of his son and remove them for burial." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpagus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpagus
- justinclift 9y ago
  > Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. Er... not sure what animals you're referring to? Predators in general seem to be quite happy to chow down on prey regardless of what activity it's involved in at the time.
  - bhnmmhmd 9y ago
    Just as one example, please watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQFdJXS2Gk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQFdJXS2Gk
    - gonvaled 9y ago
      Genes randomly failing, or maybe subtle calculation that an adult monkey is more food than a baby monkey.
      - bhnmmhmd 9y ago
        Are we actually talking about animals now? I don't think we should digress from the main subject here.
        gonvaled 9y ago
        You brought it up?!
      - PhasmaFelis 9y ago
        It's pretty interesting, really. Mammals in general have a strong instinct to recognize and protect the traits that characterize infants (disproportionately large head/eyes, high-pitched vocalization, etc), which is where we get our concept of "cute", and why cats and dogs will sometimes be extremely tolerant and protective of human children who are much bigger than they are. Occasionally, the instinct is a little too strong and overrides survival traits like "eat that delicious baby." It happens often enough to be well-documented, but it's really not the norm.
    - 9y ago
- arkitaip 9y ago
  This comment is hilarious and I would make a joke about how bizarre it is to be so offended by something that happened ca 800 years ago but apparently that's too soon, too soon.
- stronglikedan 9y ago
  > I don't know how Mongols today live with that. I would suspect rather easily, because they didn't do it.
- PhasmaFelis 9y ago
  > Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. Of course they do. A bunch of helpless babies and a mother distracted by them would be a windfall for any predator. > I don't know how Mongols today live with that. There is not a human being alive who doesn't have terrible atrocity in their bloodline. Genghis Khan isn't more evil just because he happened to be more successful than most.
- cgmg 9y ago
  > I don't know how Mongols today live with that. Why should they have trouble "living with that"? Are you saying they're responsible?
- mdekkers 9y ago
  barbarity? I´m glad the article brings it up: Genghis Khan is simply Mongolia’s greatest hero. The West recalls only what he conquered, but Mongolians remember what he created. His empire connected East and West, allowing the Silk Road to flourish. His rule enshrined the concepts of diplomatic immunity and religious freedom. He established a reliable postal service and the use of paper money. Genghis Khan didn’t just conquer the world, he civilised it.

bhnmmhmd 9y ago

Given their vicious inhumane barbarity and brutality, I'm sure if his tomb was found, millions of people would want to destroy it and exhume his body and smash it into smithereens. What they did to Iran (formerly Persia) and the middle east can not be forgotten. Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. I don't know how Mongols today live with that.

selectodude 9y ago
I think they're a bit too worried about living on $1.25/day to have strong opinions on Ghengis Khan.
pavel_lishin 9y ago
> I don't know how Mongols today live with that. Don't look too closely into your own ancestry; the only thing saving you from existential despair might be that some ancestor's violence and cruelty was only offset by their utter forgettability in the flow of history.
- bhnmmhmd 9y ago
  > the only thing saving you from existential despair might be that some ancestor's violence and cruelty was only offset by their utter forgettability in the flow of history. I think you're forgetting about the fact that in all human history, Genghis stands out as one of the cruelest and most violent rulers. As far as I know, Iranians (Persians) never did the same thing to other nations, not even for revenge. I guess that's the main reason saving Iranians from "existential despair".
  - pavel_lishin 9y ago
    I guess Genghis has a heck of a mote in his eye, eh?
  - Lokran 9y ago
    How do you feel about this ancient Persian torture method? "The intended victim was stripped naked and then firmly fastened within the interior space of two narrow rowing boats (or hollowed-out tree trunks) joined together one on top of the other with the head, hands and feet protruding. The condemned was forced to ingest milk and honey, and more honey would be poured on the victim to attract insects, with special attention devoted to the eyes, ears, mouth, face, genitals, and anus. In some cases, the executioner would mix milk and honey and pour that mixture all over the victim. The victim would then be left to float on a stagnant pond or be exposed to the sun. The defenseless individual's feces accumulated within the container, attracting more insects which would eat and breed within the victim's exposed flesh, which—pursuant to interruption of the blood supply by burrowing insects—became increasingly gangrenous. The individual would lie naked, covered from head to toe in milk, honey, and his own feces. The feeding would be repeated each day in some cases to prolong the torture, so that fatal dehydration or starvation did not occur. Death, when it eventually occurred, was probably due to a combination of dehydration, starvation, and septic shock. Delirium would typically set in after a few days.[1]." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism
  - Lokran 9y ago
    Equally, how do you feel about killing a servants son and having him eat him because he had refused to kill a child? "Herodotus accounts for the turn of Harpagus' support to a version of the cannibal feast of Thyestes.[1] He reports that Astyages, after having a dream that his daughter, Mandane, would give birth to a king who would overthrow him, ordered Harpagus to expose the child at birth. Harpagus, reluctant to spill his own royal blood, gave the child (Cyrus) to a shepherd named Mitradates,[2] who raised him as his own son. Ten years later, when Cyrus was discovered alive, Astyages cruelly punished Harpagus by killing Harpagus' only son and feeding him to the courtier during a banquet. It is said that Harpagus did not react during the banquet, other than to gather the pieces of his son and remove them for burial." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpagus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harpagus
justinclift 9y ago
> Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. Er... not sure what animals you're referring to? Predators in general seem to be quite happy to chow down on prey regardless of what activity it's involved in at the time.
- bhnmmhmd 9y ago
  Just as one example, please watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQFdJXS2Gk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQFdJXS2Gk
  - gonvaled 9y ago
    Genes randomly failing, or maybe subtle calculation that an adult monkey is more food than a baby monkey.
    - bhnmmhmd 9y ago
      Are we actually talking about animals now? I don't think we should digress from the main subject here.
      - gonvaled 9y ago
        You brought it up?!
    - PhasmaFelis 9y ago
      It's pretty interesting, really. Mammals in general have a strong instinct to recognize and protect the traits that characterize infants (disproportionately large head/eyes, high-pitched vocalization, etc), which is where we get our concept of "cute", and why cats and dogs will sometimes be extremely tolerant and protective of human children who are much bigger than they are. Occasionally, the instinct is a little too strong and overrides survival traits like "eat that delicious baby." It happens often enough to be well-documented, but it's really not the norm.
  - 9y ago
arkitaip 9y ago
This comment is hilarious and I would make a joke about how bizarre it is to be so offended by something that happened ca 800 years ago but apparently that's too soon, too soon.
stronglikedan 9y ago
> I don't know how Mongols today live with that. I would suspect rather easily, because they didn't do it.
PhasmaFelis 9y ago
> Killing a mother while she was breastfeeding her infant baby? Even animals don't do that. Of course they do. A bunch of helpless babies and a mother distracted by them would be a windfall for any predator. > I don't know how Mongols today live with that. There is not a human being alive who doesn't have terrible atrocity in their bloodline. Genghis Khan isn't more evil just because he happened to be more successful than most.
cgmg 9y ago
> I don't know how Mongols today live with that. Why should they have trouble "living with that"? Are you saying they're responsible?
mdekkers 9y ago
barbarity? I´m glad the article brings it up: Genghis Khan is simply Mongolia’s greatest hero. The West recalls only what he conquered, but Mongolians remember what he created. His empire connected East and West, allowing the Silk Road to flourish. His rule enshrined the concepts of diplomatic immunity and religious freedom. He established a reliable postal service and the use of paper money. Genghis Khan didn’t just conquer the world, he civilised it.