2 ms·
You're seemingly implying that GoDaddy should be legally forced to host any client they get and that is simply not the case. They are not beholden to the first
by sli 9y ago
You're seemingly implying that GoDaddy should be legally forced to host any client they get and that is simply not the case. They are not beholden to the first amendment in the same was that the government is, and they are not in any way obligated to host things they disagree with or things that violate their TOS. For example, 1&1 bans pictures of celebrities from being hosted on their service (or did at once point, maybe they don't know, I can't say for certain). This street works two ways, whether we like it or not.
I am no fan of GoDaddy at all, but unless they're outright lying about their TOS, they are not overstepping any boundaries. Having a view does not grant you a right to a platform.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]