I can't find anywhere we're he says that. He does say "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50%

I can't find anywhere we're he says that. He does say "Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don't have 50% representation of women in tech and leadership." And "Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business." He basically says the gap isn't 100% caused by sexism, and he thinks gender blind strategies for closing the gender gap should be used instead of non-gender blind strategies. I disagree, I'm all for programs that encourage more women in tech, even if the program has to be restricted only to women.(I think this also applies to minorities) I just don't think his argument to restrict these programs to only gender blind ones is a thought crime. P.S. I'm so tired of defending this asshole, but people are aggressively filling his mouth things he did not say.