4 ms·

The examples are somewhat forced: find ~/Desktop -name "*.jpg" -o -name "*.gif" -o -name "*.png" \ -print0 | xargs -0 mv --target-directory ~/Pictures

• michaelcampbell 16y ago
  Indeed. With zsh (and I guess more recent bash's), a lot of find is no longer necessary. The real nugget in there is using xargs AT ALL. A lot of people don't know about it and continue with the -exec option of find. Which works fine still, but is horribly inefficient. Although to be fair, I haven't found this inefficiency to be even measurable (in real time-wasted units) unless the process being exec'd is slow to start.
• junklight 16y ago
  Depends on how many files you have. In my line of work (web archiving) I frequently have more files than '*' can cope with - so need to use find even for mundane tasks