All you are really saying is, people belive in something (because its hard to believe in nothing). That doesn't explain the type of believe they hold. While an

All you are really saying is, people belive in something (because its hard to believe in nothing). That doesn't explain the type of believe they hold. While anarchy has to be the default assumption, its hardly the commonly accepted notion of the status quo. It seems much more comfortable to assume that everything is in order of a personally profitable higher purpose. Whereas conspiracies are usually attributed to a lack of moral and socially intollerable consequences. I mean, how are conspiracy theories comforting instead of scary? Instead, conspiracies and anarchy alike are scary because of a lack of cooperation.