> That is not true, here is the best point-by-point analysis But that is pretty crappy analysis, throwing your conclusion into doubt. > it's not you, it's bio

> That is not true, here is the best point-by-point analysis But that is pretty crappy analysis, throwing your conclusion into doubt. > it's not you, it's biology! What if that is literally true somewhere in the causal chain? Is it good to put managers into terror at having to justify hiring Top Men?