> the author has the credentials to have an informed opinion about the current research If you say so. I'm not an expert but as I wrote in my comment it appear

> the author has the credentials to have an informed opinion about the current research If you say so. I'm not an expert but as I wrote in my comment it appears either terribly sourced or the author equates replies to research as full blown studies. > Here's another one, but from a Psychologist rather than a neurologist. This one, as far as I can tell, mostly ignores much of the critical feedback that I've seen so far. Again, I'm not an expert but I'm surprised it doesn't call this out explicitly and in greater detail if the critics are wrong. Like, it has some small references to it but not a lot of direct discussion around it. Not that all of the critical articles are better in terms of sources, etc I just haven't seen any of the articles in support of the memo be very well sourced or respond to much of the criticism directly.