3 ms·
> Nobody likes being regulated, but everything (cars, planes, food, drugs, etc) that's a danger to the public is regulated. AI should be too. I hate that peopl
by candiodari 9y ago
> Nobody likes being regulated, but everything (cars, planes, food, drugs, etc) that's a danger to the public is regulated. AI should be too.
I hate that people actually see things this way. Regulation to prevent AIs from taking over the world will never happen, because nation states won't cooperate on such rules [1]. Additionally you can't catch people using AIs to determine their actions.
BUT what regulation can do is prevent people from competing with a few of Larry Page's and Elon Musk's businesses.
[1] https://www.rt.com/news/395375-kalashnikov-automated-neural-network-gun/ https://www.rt.com/news/395375-kalashnikov-automated-neural-...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- icebraining 9y agoThere are other dangers besides "taking over the world". In fact, Elon Musk should know, since his company's AI already got people killed.
- sweden 9y agoThe "taking of the world" scenario is a too narrow view of the whole complexity of AI regulation. There are other more realistic and important scenarios that need to be addressed, for example: AI's default behaviour when challenged with a possibility of a car accident on a self driving system. Should the car try to avoid the accident by jumping of a cliff, sacrificing the life of the driver and of the people inside the car, or should it hit the next car making the accident worse for the other person but potentially saving the life of the people inside the car?
- mizzao 9y agoYou must be thinking of http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ But in practice, this is more a study of people's ethical tendencies around the world than a practical way to address AI decision-making in bad situations.