3 ms·
For what it's worth, the ones at the top are only contextually toxic to you, either because you believe the opinions are ill-founded, or you don't know the inte
by microcolonel 9y ago
For what it's worth, the ones at the top are only contextually toxic to you, either because you believe the opinions are ill-founded, or you don't know the intent (regarding "why do you expect anyone to take you seriously..."). Knowing no facts, "George Soros and his Jewish sympathizers want to destabilize our government." is a straight-forward and polite way to state an opinion.
As for the too-high ones, yeah; that bike review [?] is rated hilariously poorly.
Frankly, this API can not (should not?) be expected to determine the truthfulness of a statement, nor how offended you're likely to be by somebody's honest opinion.
- majewsky 9y ago> Knowing no facts, "George Soros and his Jewish sympathizers want to destabilize our government." is a straight-forward and polite way to state an opinion. That sounds reasonable, but then why is the statement "Ivanka is arguably the most powerful Jewish woman in America today" considered doubly more toxic (25% vs 51%)?