4 ms·
Two examples that support your reasoning: > Your a socialist snowflake! Is ranked as less toxic than: > Please put yourself in the shoes of women, minorities
by dr_zoidberg 9y ago
Two examples that support your reasoning:
> Your a socialist snowflake!
Is ranked as less toxic than:
> Please put yourself in the shoes of women, minorities, and LGBT people
Extracted from the "US Election" demo on the page.
Edit: for the sake of clarity, when taken to the textbox below, snowflake gets 58% toxicity, and minorities gets 29%. Still, when using the slider, snowflake appears before, with a circle (which would correspond to an ok comment), and minorities much later on, with a square (which would be a dubious comment).
Edit 2: testing on the textbox, commas and periods get you a lower score (less toxic), while exclamation marks, lack of punctuation, and "bad writing" (not just grammar, but a general bad style you could say) get you a higher score.
Edit 3: the final gem I'll take for my professors at University: FAT is an old filesystem! gets 90% :P
Secret -- caps seem to also rise the score.
Actualy... fat 88%, fat_ 41%... now that's it, I got tired of this.
- majewsky 9y ago> "Your a socialist snowflake!" is ranked as less toxic Maybe it tripped over the wrong usage of "your"? :)