>Why are we entertaining the notion that women might be biologically less inclined for engineering? Because it's basically true and all the evidence points to

>Why are we entertaining the notion that women might be biologically less inclined for engineering? Because it's basically true and all the evidence points to it? (See my comment below.) That we aren't even supposed to talk about scientific facts for political reasons is deeply disturbing. >Why is the CEO somehow obligated to debunk the theory? Because the CEO is promoting policies that sexistly discriminate against women in favor of men and firing employees for their political opinions. The very least they could do is provide some argument for why their opinions are right.