2 ms·
Why would you consider it spam? Have you read the articles on the site?
by kadavy 16y ago
Why would you consider it spam? Have you read the articles on the site?
- minalecs 16y agoyes.. 1st. about coupons.. ( nothing to do with entrepreneurship, technical, programming.. etc) , 2nd. some good statistical analysis here ( you should of just submitted direct link to here) 3rd. article about responding to a wink( nothing to do with entrepreneurship, technical, programming.. etc) , 4. oped piece about about not talking about youself 5. another ad for signing in to match.com so out of the first 5 blog articles i visited only one of them would be considered good content for this site. spam
- kadavy 16y agoThe news item I'm referring to does link directly to the statistical analysis post you're describing. I don't know why we're even bothering discussing whether people would mark this site as spam (opinions on this thread seem to be tainted by the just-world fallacy). The articles on this site are frequently upvoted on HN when referenced, and the data from my other comment on this thread shows that HN readers are interested in its content. The bottom-line is: no matter what the content of an article on this site is, it will automatically be dead because of an overly-zealous filter. Is there anything that can be done about that?