I seem to have hit the max reply depth, so sibling posts will have to do. > disable JS and images > They're all the same thing. I'm deciding how I want to con

I seem to have hit the max reply depth, so sibling posts will have to do. > disable JS and images > They're all the same thing. I'm deciding how I want to consume content; I'm not circumventing a access control mechanism. I guess the difference I am trying to highlight is: * a lack of ads for hard technical and/or compatibility reasons (JS not enabled, images not enabled, graphics subsystems not existing, not having sufficient eyesight, etc.), versus * a lack of ads because screw you. This line in the sand may be stupid, but I'm afraid it's not "the same thing." I'm afraid this difference could be argued successfully in court, and that is my point.