I think the problem is the person at the center of the debate is not good with words. He at times simultaneously says that he merely introduces the possibility

I think the problem is the person at the center of the debate is not good with words. He at times simultaneously says that he merely introduces the possibility that biological differences cause genders to choose different roles, and that biological differences cause less women to enter tech and leadership roles. One statement sounds like unestablished scientific fact, and the other sounds like it's already been established. Note that this is exactly what Trump does, and the more he speaks, the more people he activates on both sides of the debate. Scientifically speaking, this feels pretty disingenuous. On the other hand, if you previously felt apathy was a problem in democracy, perhaps this is a cure.