> It's not Github's job to stand up to DMCA notices. I want to make it clear that I'm not arguing for the legal grounds here. I'm not a lawyer, so I will leave

> It's not Github's job to stand up to DMCA notices. I want to make it clear that I'm not arguing for the legal grounds here. I'm not a lawyer, so I will leave that to them. I'm arguing from a more moral/ethical stance. I'd like to disagree with you. By allowing you to run under their umbrella, I feel that Github has a responsibility to take care of you, and the data that you put on their site. I feel that it is quite insincere for them to say "Sure, put your code on our site!" but then kick you to the curb as soon as there's any trouble. There's definitely a level of extremity that I don't expect from them: I think that after a certain amount of legal argument, they should pass it to the uploader, but I feel like their default attitude should be "no, you can't just attack the uploader because you feel like it." It sends a clear message to the FOSS community that they don't care about taking care of their own, which is bad for Github, and bad for the committers. I'd be curious though: Why do you think that "The law requires them to forward them to the account publishing the content without any consideration of the merits"? It's my understanding that they do have some grounds here as it is their site. EDIT: I reworded my post as the original was rude, and accusatory.