I've heard it was illegal for Google to keep him on. Here's what I've found online: > Explicit protections against ... sexually hostile work environments, ...

I've heard it was illegal for Google to keep him on. Here's what I've found online: > Explicit protections against ... sexually hostile work environments, ... discrimination against unlawful sex stereotypes From https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-gender-discrimination#2 https://www.workplacefairness.org/sexual-gender-discriminati.... I would love to see a response from a lawyer. My understanding as a layperson is: 1. He is saying that biological differences explain why fewer women go into tech. That is not true, here is the best point-by-point analysis I've seen on it: https://www.quora.com/What-do-scientists-think-about-the-biological-claims-made-in-the-anti-diversity-document-written-by-a-Google-employee-in-August-2017/answer/Suzanne-Sadedin https://www.quora.com/What-do-scientists-think-about-the-bio... 2. If you are a manager, and you ignore this analysis and agree that there is a biological difference, you can use that to explain why you aren't hiring/promoting women: it's not you, it's biology!