4 ms·
It sounds like you don't understand why he was fired. Hint: it wasn't because of his beliefs per se. It was more likely because of his repetition of gender ster
by sidlls 9y ago
It sounds like you don't understand why he was fired. Hint: it wasn't because of his beliefs per se. It was more likely because of his repetition of gender stereotypes that impeded his ability to work effectively with his peers.
- toomuchtodo 9y ago> It was more likely because of his repetition of gender stereotypes I keep hearing this line parroted, but that's not how the situation played out, and you either are inadvertently or maliciously being disingenuous. You're entitled to your opinion, of course, but there are facts, and those facts aren't congruent with the narrative.
- sidlls 9y agoHow are the facts incongruent with the narrative you object to? Generally people who support this guy focus on only the bits of fact the memo author relied on: they ignore the context and his application of alleged facts. That's what you did, for example.
- toomuchtodo 9y ago> they ignore the context and his application of alleged facts. You're projecting what isn't there. Again, part of the problem.
- sidlls 9y agoNo, I'm not projecting anything.