This is hilarious. How are you judging the quality or performance of my code again? Being fair, you're wrong on all fronts. Our code quality has increased dra

This is hilarious. How are you judging the quality or performance of my code again? Being fair, you're wrong on all fronts. Our code quality has increased dramatically if only by being able to replace swathes of thread and Twisted glue with asyncio. The very same upgrades saw a ×10 runtime speed-up in some claggy mixed-layer code. But even just comparing runtimes, 3.6 isn't slow[1]. They're about the same. If your only opinion of Python 3 is it does unicode and it's slow, you may want to read the first line of the comment you replied to. Your arguments may have applied to Python 3.3 but they hold little weight in 2017. [1]: https://speed.python.org/comparison/ https://speed.python.org/comparison/