4 ms·
Not sure what you mean, because plenty of people lambasting him ARE indeed lambasting him over the suggestion that it's incorrect to insist that anything short
by kinkrtyavimoodh 9y ago
Not sure what you mean, because plenty of people lambasting him ARE indeed lambasting him over the suggestion that it's incorrect to insist that anything short of a 50-50 gender ratio at Google is because of discrimination against women.
Of course they are not lambasting him in those words (that would be charitable). They are saying ridiculous nonsense like "Google employee claims women are inferior than men" or "Google employee claims women are not suited to be software engineers".
- dguaraglia 9y ago> Of course they are not lambasting him in those words (that would be charitable). They are saying ridiculous nonsense like "Google employee claims women are inferior than men" or "Google employee claims women are not suited to be software engineers" Things he wraps around in cozy wording, but essentially suggests to be true. If not, what's the point of him complaining about outreach efforts? It's not like right now we are in a scenario where, say, 45% of the engineering workforce at Google is female, and Google is trying to force a 50/50 split. It's not even close. Right now the number is 20%, are you telling me it's settled science that should be the ratio? Because if you have hard numbers proving that's the case, then by all means, Google is wasting money in outreach efforts. You should tell them right now.