4 ms·

>You can't arbitrarily say that the line stops at one thing I never said that or implied that. You misinterpreted. It makes zero sense to bring up rape when ta

>You can't arbitrarily say that the line stops at one thing I never said that or implied that. You misinterpreted. It makes zero sense to bring up rape when talking about this Google manifesto. I do think sexism and racism occur in the tech industry. However, not comparable in extremity to rape. This trivializes the experiences that rape victims actually do face. I'm not a moderator of course, so say what you want. But it makes your talking points looking appear ridiculous and nonsensical. Perhaps, your comments would be more relevant in the Binary Capital case.

norea-armozel 9y ago
My comment was in reply to another comment which wasn't directly related to the letter that Damore wrote. I think you really need to read the comment I'm replying to before asserting anything else because I think you're confused. Try from the beginning and read.
- needless2 9y ago
  i did read that person's comment. Nobody else mentioned rape until you did.
  - norea-armozel 9y ago
    Yet my comment was about blaming victims. So can you admit you're an intellectually dishonest hack that should bow out now and get a job as a CNN contrarian talking head? I heard there's been some vacancies made.
    - needlessly2 9y ago
      okay. stop throwing a tantrum because you were wrong
      - norea-armozel 9y ago
        Can you actually prove that I'm wrong or are you going to admit you're a liar? Because there's a big problem with your non-argument so far since you assume that the discussion isn't about victim blaming when the grandparent comment was victim blaming. So yeah, you need to really get your argument out and not latch onto the inconsequential things in my argument you don't like (like the tone or whatever). Either stand up and deliver an argument or go away. Edit: Also down voting me won't make your argument correct.
        needlessly2 9y ago
        i'm actually not down voting you. However, other people are.

norea-armozel 9y ago

My comment was in reply to another comment which wasn't directly related to the letter that Damore wrote. I think you really need to read the comment I'm replying to before asserting anything else because I think you're confused. Try from the beginning and read.

needless2 9y ago
i did read that person's comment. Nobody else mentioned rape until you did.
- norea-armozel 9y ago
  Yet my comment was about blaming victims. So can you admit you're an intellectually dishonest hack that should bow out now and get a job as a CNN contrarian talking head? I heard there's been some vacancies made.
  - needlessly2 9y ago
    okay. stop throwing a tantrum because you were wrong
    - norea-armozel 9y ago
      Can you actually prove that I'm wrong or are you going to admit you're a liar? Because there's a big problem with your non-argument so far since you assume that the discussion isn't about victim blaming when the grandparent comment was victim blaming. So yeah, you need to really get your argument out and not latch onto the inconsequential things in my argument you don't like (like the tone or whatever). Either stand up and deliver an argument or go away. Edit: Also down voting me won't make your argument correct.
      - needlessly2 9y ago
        i'm actually not down voting you. However, other people are.