4 ms·
> which, I may be wrong, didn't actually invite debate, it was more of a rant You are wrong. Why do people persist in commenting about a document they appear n
by danarmak 9y ago
> which, I may be wrong, didn't actually invite debate, it was more of a rant
You are wrong. Why do people persist in commenting about a document they appear not to have read?
The memo can be found at https://diversitymemo.com/ https://diversitymemo.com/ .
- ue_ 9y agoI have read it, though I can't find where he calls for scientific debate (or any kind of debate) rather than reeling off a list of points with more Wikipedia links and popsci articles than someone with research skills should know not to put in. I just realised how comical the little table of "left biases" and "right biases" is, even if he does try to hedge out the unfounded categorisations with "it's not 100% accurate".
- danso 9y agoI read the memo and it was a rant. There are sections in which random thoughts are connected and unfinished, like a stream of consciousness
- s73ver_ 9y agoWhy do people persist in assuming that anyone who disagrees with their particular interpretation of the manifesto didn't read it? It's incredibly uncivil, and does nothing except try to shut down conversation.