4 ms·
Hahaha. Oh, yes, I'm aware of that, but the amount he mentioned was strange. But yeah, perhaps he was using a nonlinear comparison as you said, which would make
by markbao 16y ago
Hahaha. Oh, yes, I'm aware of that, but the amount he mentioned was strange. But yeah, perhaps he was using a nonlinear comparison as you said, which would make more sense.
- clay 16y agoThis link says 1 inch = $30000. http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/02/height-matters-income-vs-height-trade.html http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/02/height-matters-income-vs...
- hugh3 16y agoHmph, well the study is by Dan Airely, so he's just citing himself. Now I want to plot a graph: "Number of papers written about the effect of height on male attractiveness" vs "height of author"
- aspiringsensei 16y agoThis is an excellent reason why all published works should include a diverse collection of very ephemeral metadata.
- billmcneale 16y ago> This link says 1 inch = $30000. Good to know. Do you have a similar number for tallness?
- jboydyhacker 16y agoWell it says at around 5'9 an inch is worth 30K. Two larger questions arise out of the whole topic? 1. Is the relationship linear? i.e. at 6 vs 5'8, is it 30K per inch, or does the price of the woman start to drop based on your height? 2. If a women's interest is dictated in $$$, what does that imply? Why do men tolerate women who act like this? Why do we raise our daughters to think like this?