Bingo. Rarely if ever have i seen someone considered anti-systemd as being pro-sysv. What they are pro however is init diversity. With sysv, it was relatively

Bingo. Rarely if ever have i seen someone considered anti-systemd as being pro-sysv. What they are pro however is init diversity. With sysv, it was relatively easy to slot in a different init as the admin wanted. A distro i have used for some time, Gobolinux, may use the sysv init binary for example. But it forgoes the usual sysv layout for one more akin to just a rc.local. But with systemd it is systemd, and only systemd, because systemd is so "invasive". And the real worry is when third party developers assume systemd as the default and make it hard, or resist, supporting alternatives.