3 ms·
> You mean since about 1790? There have always been two parties in congress (minus the era of good feelings) and they have always had opposing ideology, and hav
by jlarocco 9y ago
> You mean since about 1790? There have always been two parties in congress (minus the era of good feelings) and they have always had opposing ideology, and have almost always blocked one another's proposals.
That's by design, actually. The goal was never to create a government that can efficiently create a million laws and regulations.
The point of having multiple parties is that each of them will block each other and only the laws and regulations that everybody can agree on will actually get through.
Unfortunately, politicians have been learning to game the system for ~200 years now, and it's not working exactly as designed.
Another big difference lately seems to be that everybody's an extremist because nobody can change their mind or compromise without getting called out in the media for back pedaling or giving up or "working with the enemy" or whatever.
- alphapapa 9y ago> The point of having multiple parties is that each of them will block each other and only the laws and regulations that everybody can agree on will actually get through. Gridlock is part of the design, yes. But consensus or unanimity are not. The simple majority rules, except for the cases defined in the Constitution, such as constitutional amendments. The Senate's filibuster is not how the Senate is supposed to function.