3 ms·

How's that relevant to the point of the article?

• Torai 9y ago
  With his article on the NYT, he has become one the principal actors and is contributing to make the drama bigger.
  • cocktailpeanuts 9y ago
    so how's that relevant to your comment? Does this change anything about there being multiple actors in this drama?
    • Torai 9y ago
      In the article: > There are many actors in the whole Google/diversity drama, but I’d say the one who’s behaved the worst is the C.E.O., Sundar Pichai. He is implicitly criticizing the whole drama thing. And when saying Pichai behaved worst, I understand he is saying Pichai was who contributed most to make the drama bigger. I think Brooks is contributing a lot to make the drama bigger. That's my point.
      • cocktailpeanuts 9y ago
        So is your point that this journalist guy should just not write about it? That's his job. It's different from a CEO making a bad decision.
        • Torai 9y ago
          No. I only have criticized the hypocrisy of the sentence I've quoted.
        • nlowell 9y ago
          It's one thing to write about something, it's another thing to have a call for action.