4 ms·

>What sort of substantiation do you think I'm missing? All? Everything you notably had to add in this comment? >using a shitty library >The time for jQuery i

>What sort of substantiation do you think I'm missing? All? Everything you notably had to add in this comment? >using a shitty library >The time for jQuery is long past Easily-found examples of opinion without substance. >probably selling my information to advertisers You think Bootstrap JS plugins are selling your information? I suggest you take a glance at the open source code. >cognative [sic] impact from having to use jQuery to interact with Bootstrap $(div).modal()? I'm ok with that level of cognitive impact. >I didn't issue personal attacks So the "people like you" was entirely impersonal? Forgive my misunderstanding.

Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
>All? Everything you notably had to add in this comment? What, answers to your questions? Cool it down bud. I assumed from the outset that you didn't actually believe jQuery was a good library but rather that you thought it was acceptable for Bootstrap to use it. If we really need to go over why jQuery is a shitty library, well, see the link you responded to in the first place. >$(div).modal()? I'm ok with that level of cognitive impact. Not just $(div).modal(), but compounded with the fact that everything else is going to be using something other than jQuery. You're probably using React or Angular or something similarly less stupid than jQuery, and you will have pain points everywhere the two systems have to touch. >So the "people like you" was entirely impersonal? Forgive my misunderstanding. Yes, "people like you" who think jQuery is still a good idea in 2017.
- SippinLean 9y ago
  >If we really need to go over why jQuery is a shitty library, well, see the link you responded to in the first place. I already pointed out that article's shortcomings. You responded with calling jQuery "shitty" and a personal attack. >You're probably using React or Angular Oh sure, I didn't suggest using jQuery with Angular. Please reference the title of the post for the context of my argument. >Yes, "people like you" So, a personal attack. I'm glad we now agree.
  - albedoa 9y ago
    > So, a personal attack. I'm glad we now agree. You've been thoroughly corrected already. If you insist on receiving every attack on your argument as a personal slight, then that is your prerogative. But please, leave the rest of us out of your nonsense.
    - SippinLean 9y ago
      >If you insist on receiving every attack on your argument as a personal slight Compared to this overt oversimplification, I don't. I addressed the attacks on my argument as such. I made no mention of a personal attack until it was presented, and if you scan the rest of my comments on the thread you can see I didn't "receive every attack" that way; your generalization is easily and instantly proved false. I identified a single personal attack, "PEOPLE like YOU" as such, and the owner of the attack agreed with me ("thoroughly corrected", in your words). I suspect you know this of course, but tried to misrepresent my objections anyway. Please, leave the rest of us out of your nonsense.
      - Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
        Go back and read it again. I agreed that it was impersonal. Please leave us out of your nonsense.
        SippinLean 9y ago
        So the set of "people like you" is exclusive of "you"?
        Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
        You really are thick, pal. That one was personal.
        SippinLean 9y ago
        Notably unable to provide a substantive answer, just more petty insults. Let's not.

Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago

>All? Everything you notably had to add in this comment? What, answers to your questions? Cool it down bud. I assumed from the outset that you didn't actually believe jQuery was a good library but rather that you thought it was acceptable for Bootstrap to use it. If we really need to go over why jQuery is a shitty library, well, see the link you responded to in the first place. >$(div).modal()? I'm ok with that level of cognitive impact. Not just $(div).modal(), but compounded with the fact that everything else is going to be using something other than jQuery. You're probably using React or Angular or something similarly less stupid than jQuery, and you will have pain points everywhere the two systems have to touch. >So the "people like you" was entirely impersonal? Forgive my misunderstanding. Yes, "people like you" who think jQuery is still a good idea in 2017.

SippinLean 9y ago
>If we really need to go over why jQuery is a shitty library, well, see the link you responded to in the first place. I already pointed out that article's shortcomings. You responded with calling jQuery "shitty" and a personal attack. >You're probably using React or Angular Oh sure, I didn't suggest using jQuery with Angular. Please reference the title of the post for the context of my argument. >Yes, "people like you" So, a personal attack. I'm glad we now agree.
- albedoa 9y ago
  > So, a personal attack. I'm glad we now agree. You've been thoroughly corrected already. If you insist on receiving every attack on your argument as a personal slight, then that is your prerogative. But please, leave the rest of us out of your nonsense.
  - SippinLean 9y ago
    >If you insist on receiving every attack on your argument as a personal slight Compared to this overt oversimplification, I don't. I addressed the attacks on my argument as such. I made no mention of a personal attack until it was presented, and if you scan the rest of my comments on the thread you can see I didn't "receive every attack" that way; your generalization is easily and instantly proved false. I identified a single personal attack, "PEOPLE like YOU" as such, and the owner of the attack agreed with me ("thoroughly corrected", in your words). I suspect you know this of course, but tried to misrepresent my objections anyway. Please, leave the rest of us out of your nonsense.
    - Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
      Go back and read it again. I agreed that it was impersonal. Please leave us out of your nonsense.
      - SippinLean 9y ago
        So the set of "people like you" is exclusive of "you"?
        Sir_Cmpwn 9y ago
        You really are thick, pal. That one was personal.
        SippinLean 9y ago
        Notably unable to provide a substantive answer, just more petty insults. Let's not.