4 ms·
The problem here is that even when building is "functional", the needs of the functions change. If the architect does not allow it, or if the building is not we
by ptaipale 9y ago
The problem here is that even when building is "functional", the needs of the functions change. If the architect does not allow it, or if the building is not well adaptable, the "functionality" becomes "non-functionality".
In my case it was that the architect (who worked in early 1960's) could foresee classrooms with tables, but could not foresee that the classroom tables would have computers connected to a network (as they had in 1980's).
- StavrosK 9y agoAh, I hadn't considered that, thank you.
- Bartweiss 9y agoThis is a crucial point. I'm told Brutalism was fairly functional when it came into existence; much of it certainly isn't any more. Building structures with exposed structural materials means there's no space for hidden infrastructure like cabling and power points. Building structures out of concrete in particular is antithetical to modern technology - no one could have seen WiFi coming, but it's a major hurdle in all-concrete structures. The shift to power outlets and internet connectivity is a major aspect of usability; it's a shame that so much of Brutalism is in colleges and transit spaces where people urgently want those things.