> emacs is ridicously bad at editing text. The thing is I can't imagine thinking that, unless I was coming from vim. Coming from any other style of "editor",

> emacs is ridicously bad at editing text. The thing is I can't imagine thinking that, unless I was coming from vim. Coming from any other style of "editor", I would think the text editing capabilities of emacs were really good. Of course, I am coming from vim now, so I'm completely spoiled.