> Only one of us insists our experience is canonical, and an appropriated basis for advocating bigotry & prejudice based on diction. You've missed the forest f

> Only one of us insists our experience is canonical, and an appropriated basis for advocating bigotry & prejudice based on diction. You've missed the forest for the trees. Whether on purpose or not, lets cut this tree for once and for all. Is anecdotal evidence admissable in court? then why is not in debate? Because it's a differing opinion. So tell me, who's the bigot you are referring to? It's not rendered invalid simply because you are purposely froward to avoid concession.