> 1)/[sic]he never made a case for why we shouldn’t think other factors are even bigger Really? The memo wasn't about answering life's questions, but to propos

> 1)/[sic]he never made a case for why we shouldn’t think other factors are even bigger Really? The memo wasn't about answering life's questions, but to propose narrow solutions with based on pointed evidence. Preference or not, attacking the hypothesis because you want a different one answered is idiotic and is not a proper response. It's basically a common SJW ad hominem. "You just aren't smart enough to understand what's going on here!" Julia might want to look at the nordic countries that have pushed the gender gaps even wider with some very sophisticated progressive social policies to prevent other factors.