> that views female engineers as biologically inferior for the job Did you read the article? Here's the money quote: > His hypothesis implies that personality

> that views female engineers as biologically inferior for the job Did you read the article? Here's the money quote: > His hypothesis implies that personality differences mean a smaller percentage of women will be interested in and/or qualified for a Google job than men, but that doesn’t mean any of the women at Google fall below the “qualified” threshold. None of his expressed views lead me to assume that he'd think less of a female candidate that made it through the screening process -- and that's a viewpoint he's explicitly concerned about protecting. Even if some of his opinions did lead him to have biases at least he's open about them and interested in examining them which is the first step to fixing them.