3 ms·
Wasn’t that the same type of conflict that doomed the Newton? The engineers didn’t want marketing to talk about the handwriting recognition (nice extra, look w
by protomyth 9y ago
Wasn’t that the same type of conflict that doomed the Newton? The engineers didn’t want marketing to talk about the handwriting recognition (nice extra, look what other things we do) but marketing ignored them. The Newton never recovered.
- Angostura 9y agoThe engineers didn't want marketing to talk about the primary method of data entry and one of the most superficially innovative thing about it? I can only imagine the look on marketing's face when they heard that one.
- protomyth 9y agoIt wouldn't have been the primary. The Newton had an on screen keyboard like products today. Innovation is only innovation if it works, and the Newton had a lot of amazing things going on, some of which the iPhone doesn't even attempt. The emphasis on handwriting recognition killed the product (along with a healthy does of hatred from Steve Jobs).
- Angostura 9y agoIt really didn't kill the product - Jobs did. Yes, the Newton OS had some great stuff in it - I loved the soup model, but in terms of a newspaper or billboard ad? The handwriting was a no-brainer. Yes it was mocked - in much the same way that Siri is mocked today, but with small adjustyto your native handwriting written input became fast Nd accurate
- protomyth 9y agoIt was mocked before on national tv when national tv was still a thing. It killed any hope for that product. It was mocked on tv, comics, and everyone who did a review. Heck, the Simpsons mocked it long after. It had plenty of billboard quality features (the intelligent stuff was practically built for ads) much more than its simpler, limited competition.